Jubilee Party Secretary General, Jeremiah Kioni, has provided a rebuttal to Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua's recent remarks regarding the reinstatement of security for politicians after three months. In his response, Kioni emphasized that the security officers are not solely for the benefit of politicians but are meant to serve the current government. He also pointed out the potential dangers of relying solely on these officers for protection.
Additionally, Kioni accused the government of using police officers to frame opposition leaders for assault cases, further calling into question the control and independence of law enforcement agencies. This article will explore Kioni's concerns and provide insights into the ongoing debate surrounding security measures for political figures in Kenya.
Additionally, Kioni accused the government of using police officers to frame opposition leaders for assault cases, further calling into question the control and independence of law enforcement agencies. This article will explore Kioni's concerns and provide insights into the ongoing debate surrounding security measures for political figures in Kenya.
Security Withdrawal and Politicians' Safety:
According to Kioni's statement, the withdrawal of security personnel has left politicians questioning whether the officers were truly there to protect them or potentially exploit them. He expressed the need for politicians to be prepared to safeguard themselves, given the uncertainty surrounding their safety. Kioni's remark indicates a lack of reliance on the government's provision of security and highlights the need for individuals to take personal responsibility for their well-being.
Politicians as Targets for Alleged Framing:
Kioni further alleged that police officers have been used to frame opposition leaders by implicating them in assault cases during protests. He even mentioned a plan to plant firearms used during the protests in various homes, including that of former President Uhuru Kenyatta's eldest son. This accusation raises serious concerns about the impartiality and integrity of the police force. Kioni's statement suggests a manipulation of law enforcement agencies by a select few in positions of power.
The Role of the Inspector General of Police:
Kioni echoed the sentiment that the Inspector General of Police, Japhet Koome, should operate as an independent body not swayed by external influences. This call for autonomy highlights the need for law enforcement agencies to prioritize the safety and security of all Kenyans without succumbing to political pressure or manipulation.
Deputy President's Three-Month Security Reinstatement:
Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua recently announced that security officers recalled by the national government following anti-government protests would be reinstated after three months. Gachagua attributed this decision to the need for assurances from the opposition coalition, Azimio, that there would be no further demonstrations. However, Kioni expressed a sense of urgency, stating that three months was too long to wait and that politicians were accustomed to functioning without security.
Conclusion:
Jeremiah Kioni's response to Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua's remarks highlights the complexities and concerns surrounding the security of politicians in Kenya. The withdrawal of security personnel and the alleged framing of opposition leaders raise questions about the impartiality and integrity of law enforcement agencies. Kioni stressed the need for individuals to take personal responsibility for their safety in light of these uncertainties. Ultimately, the discussion surrounding the reinstatement of security measures for politicians requires a balanced consideration of both the benefits and potential risks involved.
